Intended correlations supported the construct validity of the TLQ in most cases. The internal consistency of the TLQ and individual subscales was high. ![]() Using CFA on a second independent sample of 235 undergraduate students, the intended four-factor model fit the data moderately well compared to a unidimensional model but essentially the same compared to the two-factor model that emerged during the EFA. ![]() An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the TLQ demonstrated sufficient evidence of a four-component theory of transformational leadership, although a two-factor model also emerged. The internal consistency of the MLQ was acceptable to high. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on data obtained from 305 undergraduate students yielded ambiguous results when comparing a unidimensional and the intended five-factor model of transformational leadership underlying the MLQ. ![]() Due to past concerns of its inability to demonstrate dimensionality, the current study assessed the reliability and validity of the transformational leadership scale of the MLQ and devised the Transformational Leadership Questionnaire (TLQ). The transformational leadership dimension of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ Bass & Avolio, 1995) is the mostly widely used measure of transformational leadership.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |